perfsonar development work

[Roman Lapacz <>]

Wiadomość napisana w dniu 2008-09-30, o godz. 13:36, przez Gijs  
Molenaar:

> Nicolas Simar wrote:
> > Yes it is.
>
> So why don't all the packages follow this convention yet? Or am I  
> wrong?

No. Nicolas,  you are wrong. Some time ago we were discussing this and  
we agreed (that's my understanding) that we would keep the current  
naming convention. There is no strong and reasonable need to change it  
for the release 3.1 and probably for the next ones.

Roman


> > Gijs Molenaar wrote:
> > > I have not seen any conclusions about this on the mailinglist;
> > >
> > > What is the naming schema for the packages?
> > >
> > > is ps-mdm-flowsa-ma ps-mdm-flowsub-mp correct as what Loukik had  
> > > in mind?
> > >
> > >
> > > - gijs
>
>
> --
> Gijs Molenaar
>
> fingerprint C660 BABA 4B91 4B5C EB60 7739 4385 8ABA 72EE 99CA