perfsonar-dev - Re: [Fwd: Re: New packaging system]
Subject: perfsonar development work
List archive
- From: Gina Kramer <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: New packaging system]
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:57:38 +0100
Anyone willing and able to help, please? Gijs Molenaar wrote: Sorry, but I don't have the time anymore now to answer these questions. There should be someone else in the project who has this knowledge and time, please post these questions to the mailinglist. Gina Kramer schreef:Hi Gijs, I've had a look at the Packaging page you've created but not being a developer it's unfortunately mostly Greek to me. So what does a user have to do to install 3.1 or upgrade to 3.1? Are the same platforms still supported? (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4.x or 5.x, Fedora 8, CentOS 5.1, Debian 4.0) Are the following tables still accurate? Installing pre-requisite software using packages The perfSONAR MDM services require some software to be present on their host machine, before they can be installed: Installing pre-requisite software using tar files The perfSONAR MDM services require some software to be present on their host machine, before they can be installed: What do you mean by "perfSONAR repositories" on http://wiki.perfsonar.net/jra1-wiki/index.php/Packaging/Repositories? Are these installer files that the user needs to download? What's the deal with the perfSONAR installation CD? Can 3.1 only be installed from CD? The http://perfsonar.pythonic.nl/cd link points to so ISO files - what should the user do with those? Sorry, these are probably dumb questions but I need to know :-) Cheers, Gina Nicolas Simar wrote:Hi Gina, for the installation guide, the procedure has changed. See below the information sent by Gijs. The documentation need updating. Nicolas -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: New packaging system Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:45:57 +0200 From: Gijs Molenaar To: Nicolas Simar CC: Roman Lapacz , Stephan Kraft References: Nicolas Simar wrote:Hi Gijs, quick question about the new packaging system, does it change the way the installation is done?Yes, completely.Do we need to update the installation documentation we are distributing to the users (installation steps or configuration steps modified)? http://anonsvn.internet2.edu/svn/perfsonar/trunk/perfsonar-doc/manuals/perfsonar-mdm/http://wiki.perfsonar.net/jra1-wiki/index.php/Packaging. Everything is documented on these wiki pages: * Java Installation, I created a new java installation procedure * People need to add the repository to their system * Tomcat/exist installation is not necessary, this is done automatically trough package dependencies. * package installation is as simple as running apt-get install ps-mdm-<package> or yum install ps-mdm-<package> * package configuration is package dependend For example; take a look at the ps-mdm-flowsa-ma installation procedure: http://wiki.perfsonar.net/jra1-wiki/index.php/Flow_Selection_and_Aggregation_MA/Installation Note that the STABLE and 3.1 package repository still needs to be build, see packaging pages for info. |
- Re: [Fwd: Re: New packaging system], Gina Kramer, 08/26/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: [Fwd: Re: New packaging system], Roman Lapacz, 08/26/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: [Fwd: Re: New packaging system], Nicolas Simar, 08/26/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: [Fwd: Re: New packaging system], Roman Lapacz, 08/26/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.