Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-dev - Re: [pS-dev] Re: Self-test triggering/response messages pointer

Subject: perfsonar development work

List archive

Re: [pS-dev] Re: Self-test triggering/response messages pointer


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Verena Venus <>
  • To: "Michael Bischoff" <>
  • Cc: , "Luchesar V. ILIEV" <>, "Roman Lapacz" <>, "Szymon Trocha" <>, "Maciej Glowiak" <>, "Stijn Melis" <>, Cándido Rodríguez Montes <>, "Nicolas Simar" <>, "Domenico Vicinanza" <>, "perfSONAR developers" <>, , "Jeff W. Boote" <>
  • Subject: Re: [pS-dev] Re: Self-test triggering/response messages pointer
  • Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:31:05 +0200
  • Organization: Rechenzentrum Erlangen

Hi Michael, all,

Am Freitag, 20. Juni 2008 21:38 schrieb Michael Bischoff:
> Hello everybody,
>
> See http://wiki.perfsonar.net/jra1-wiki/index.php/Talk:Service_Self-testing
>
I added a comment to it.

> More specificity which Verena's example: I really don't think a service
> admin is interested in whether or not it could find an executable in the
> first place, in the first place he wants a question to his/her answer: is
> the service correctly configured?(or similar) If the answer is no then he
> cares about what he has to do to fix it. (and thus wants to know why)
>
At the moment, this is not the point we are discussing about. The tests
performed in this example were the ones we agreed on in Zagreb as the ones
the service desk (which in this case is the requester for the tests) wants to
have. As to wether they are interested in such results or not, it's up to
them to decide. As they decided to have these tests, they get them. I
personally think, that the purpose of these self-testing feature was at first
hand, to have exactly this kind of information. However requesting more
meaningful tests is of course on the agenda for a later stage.

> see the link for a more complete story.
>
> I'm not sure what the additional complexity brings to the table.
>
I responded to this on the wiki page.

> Kind regards
>
> Michael.
>
> ps. there are more then one element with the same id now, I thought that
> was illegal.
>
Could be changed easily, thanks for noticing it.

Regards,
Verena

> > Hi all,
> >
> > Am Freitag, 20. Juni 2008 13:59:14 schrieb Jason Zurawski:
> >> All;
> >>
> >>>> I should have been more clear, I meant the link to the proposal on
> >>>> the wiki. I have only been able to find one page:
> >>>>
> >>>> http://wiki.perfsonar.net/jra1-wiki/index.php/Service_Self-testing
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> If there are others that contain more examples I would be happy to
> >>>> add some of my thoughts since it is hard to track these things via
> >>>> email.
> >>>
> >>> Jason, that's the page, and if it's about sharing thoughts on the
> >>> contents, the "discussion" area seems the best place.
> >>
> >> I have added content here:
> >>
> >>
> >> http://wiki.perfsonar.net/jra1-wiki/index.php/Service_Self-testing#Alter
> >>nat e_Proposal
> >
> > I added an example for BWCTL MP below, which, I hope, reflects your
> > proposal.
> >
> >> Comments and corrections appreciated.
> >
> > ditto.
> >
> > Verena
> >
> >
> > --
> > Verena Venus, DFN-Labor
> > Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
> > Regionales RechenZentrum Erlangen (RRZE)
> > Martensstraße 1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
> > Tel. +49 9131 85-28738, -28800, Fax +49 9131 302941
> >
> >
> > www.win-labor.dfn.de



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page