perfsonar development work

[maxim <>]

Hi Loukik,
I dont think I have access to wiki.perfsonar.net.
I've uploaded both RPMs ( for i386 and x86_64 ) here:
 
https://wiki.internet2.edu/confluence/download/attachments/22036/perfSONAR_P
S-Services-PingER-0.09-1.i386.rpm?version=1
and here
https://wiki.internet2.edu/confluence/download/attachments/22036/perfSONAR_P
S-Services-PingER-0.09-1.x86_64.rpm?version=1
It will install under /opt/perfsonar. It packaged as perl sel-contained
binary and only requires mysql to be  deployed.
Please add instalaltion instructions from here
https://wiki.internet2.edu/confluence/display/PSPS/Deploying+perfSONAR-PS+Pi
ngER
--Maxim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loukik Kudarimoti 
> [mailto:]
>  
> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 10:51 AM
> To: maxim
> Cc: 'Gijs Molenaar'; 
> ;
>  
> 
> Subject: Re: [pS-dev] RRD-MA RPM package
> 
> Hi Maxim,
> 
> The naming for the pinger package is up to you. It would be 
> good to follow linux recommendations of course. Please let us 
> know what you have named and where it can be downloaded from.
> 
> It would be nice to agree at the perfSONAR group level to 
> install all services at one location 
> (/opt/perfsonar/services) but we haven't gotten around to 
> doing this at such a wider level yet (as you can see, we have 
> our hands full with mdm release :))
> 
> Once your package is ready, we should have it downloadable 
> from various locations. At least one of them being www.perfsonar.net.
> 
> Let me know if you have any questions.
> 
> thanks,
> Loukik.
> 
> maxim wrote:
> > Hi Loukik,
> > What about pinger service where I am going to build rpm based on 
> > self-contained executable built for linux 32bit and for 
> 64bit ? What 
> > the naming should be and where it should go ?
> > Thanks,
> >         Maxim
> >
> >   
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Loukik Kudarimoti 
> >> [mailto:]
> >> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 3:01 AM
> >> To: Gijs Molenaar
> >> Cc: 
> >> 
> >> Subject: Re: [pS-dev] RRD-MA RPM package
> >>
> >> Based on naming conventions used for packages (in linux, etc), we 
> >> found that _ must be used in specific places. Also, for 
> some reasons, 
> >> debian packages cannot have underscores in the names. To maintain 
> >> similarity, we switched from _ to -
> >>
> >> Maybe Guilherme has more points to add?
> >>
> >> Loukik.
> >>
> >> Gijs Molenaar wrote:
> >>     
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Shouldn't the URL for the RRD-MA be geant2_java-rrd-ma (in 
> >>> /opt/perfsonar/tomcat/webapps), not geant2-java-rrd-ma ?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >>     
> >
> >
> >   
> 
>