perfsonar development work

[Loukik Kudarimoti <>]

Hi Maxim,

The naming for the pinger package is up to you. It would be good to 
follow linux recommendations of course. Please let us know what you have 
named and where it can be downloaded from.

It would be nice to agree at the perfSONAR group level to install all 
services at one location (/opt/perfsonar/services) but we haven't gotten 
around to doing this at such a wider level yet (as you can see, we have 
our hands full with mdm release :))

Once your package is ready, we should have it downloadable from various 
locations. At least one of them being www.perfsonar.net.

Let me know if you have any questions.

thanks,
Loukik.

maxim wrote:
> Hi Loukik,
> What about pinger service where I am going to build rpm based on
> self-contained executable
> built for linux 32bit and for 64bit ? What the naming should be and where it
> should go ?
> Thanks,
>         Maxim
>
>   
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Loukik Kudarimoti [mailto:] 
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 3:01 AM
> > To: Gijs Molenaar
> > Cc: 
> >
> > Subject: Re: [pS-dev] RRD-MA RPM package
> >
> > Based on naming conventions used for packages (in linux, 
> > etc), we found that _ must be used in specific places. Also, 
> > for some reasons, debian packages cannot have underscores in 
> > the names. To maintain similarity, we switched from _ to -
> >
> > Maybe Guilherme has more points to add?
> >
> > Loukik.
> >
> > Gijs Molenaar wrote:
> >     
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Shouldn't the URL for the RRD-MA be geant2_java-rrd-ma (in 
> > > /opt/perfsonar/tomcat/webapps), not geant2-java-rrd-ma ?
> > >
> > >
> > >   
> > >       
> >     
>
>
>