perfsonar development work

["Luchesar V. ILIEV" <>]

Fausto Vetter wrote:
> Luchesar V. ILIEV wrote:
> > 2) RESULT should be fairly straightforward, I guess, but how about 
> > ACTION -- I'm afraid I don't understand what is going to be recorded 
> > there exactly. To put it another way -- are the ACTIONs going to be 
> > fairly standard (in fact: enforced as standard?)
> Agreed. Result should be something like: SUCCESS and FAILURE... It is 
> basically a status of the action.
>
> Actions also need to be somehow standard, otherwise becomes harder later 
> to treat it.

That's exactly what I thought, but I'm not certain whether this is 
achievable, considering the difference between the various services.

One more thing that I'm thinking about: syslog "knows" what priority a 
message is, but, unless e.g. we forward it to specific file, we can't 
determine the priority by just looking at the syslog entries (please 
correct me if I'm wrong.) So, perhaps we should also have the message 
priority "explicitly" written as part of the format?

Cheers,
Luchesar