perfsonar-dev - Re: [pS-dev] Web Admin
Subject: perfsonar development work
List archive
- From: "Michael Bischoff" <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: Re: [pS-dev] Web Admin
- Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:46:33 +0100 (CET)
- Importance: Normal
> Michael Michalis wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>> Nicolas Simar wrote:
>> |
>> |
>> | Michael Michalis wrote:
>> | > Being not "fluent" with the admin web-page, can you help me a
>> little bit understanding : | > - what the happy axis page is?
>> If I remember correctly its the page that verified that the service
>> was deployed successfully | > - what involves keeping the link?
>> I'm not sure at the moment, I thought it would still work but it
>> throws an exception when I try to access it | > - what is the plan in
>> respect with "the link"? |
>> We could just add another link on the main page of web admin
>>
>
> If its too much trouble, we can leave this out for future as we are
> quite occupied by many other things that we have to do.
>
> We bundle axis and all required libraries into each webapps directory.
> So, its very unlikely that such a happiness check will be very important.
>
>
> Loukik.
I have no problem with moving it to the next cycle.
>> | I see your point there. For the properties configuration servlet we
>> plan to make it more user friendly and allow grouping. In this context we
>> can add group ordering. For the wizard I can extend the wizard
>> properties schema and add group ordering but the main problem I'm facing
>> is time, since my duties in perfSONAR are not limited to webadmin and
>> the final release date is approaching fast.
Our service is not scheduled to be included in 3.0 bundle release, we are
aiming at 3.1 or 4.0 or what ever the version after 3.0 is. We are
finishing up internal testing and bug-fixing and currently putting all
effort into converging with the bundle. This means we want to confirm to
the requirements set up for inclusion in the bundle. This also means our
deathline isn't as tight. The solution can be implemented later on, as a
quick-fix you could stick the key's in a SortedSet wich natually orders
them and I'll just include numbers in de (start of the)groupname creating
a order.
Do we have a detailed timeline anywhere?
kind regards,
Michael
- Web Admin, Michael Michalis, 02/13/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Web Admin, Michael Bischoff, 02/21/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Web Admin, Michael Michalis, 02/22/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Web Admin, Nicolas Simar, 02/22/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Web Admin, Michael Michalis, 02/22/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Web Admin, Loukik Kudarimoti, 02/22/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Web Admin, Michael Bischoff, 02/22/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Web Admin, Michael Bischoff, 02/22/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Web Admin, Michael Bischoff, 02/22/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Web Admin, Loukik Kudarimoti, 02/22/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Web Admin, Michael Michalis, 02/22/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Web Admin, Nicolas Simar, 02/22/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Web Admin, Michael Michalis, 02/22/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Web Admin, Michael Bischoff, 02/21/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.