perfsonar development work

[Loukik Kudarimoti <>]

Szymon Trocha wrote:
> Loukik Kudarimoti wrote:
> > Roman Lapacz wrote:
> > > I think that if rrd has been created then data were accepted. I'm 
> > > not sure about rrdtool itself how/if this keeps only single value.
>
> What's the problem?
I am not aware of the details. Best to ask Roman and Ilias..
> > > My general opinion about rrd store functionality is that we could 
> > > remove it from the service. I don't see any interest from users to 
> > > have it because normally tools like mrtg or cricket do it in natural 
> > > way. I think fetching should be enough.
> > Perhaps you can leave the code in but move the store interface from 
> > the documented interfaces list to the undocumented ones? If and when 
> > we resurrect the SNMP polling and data storing product, this 
> > interface can be enhanced and documented as well..
>
> Which SNMP product are you talking about? I though you abandoned your 
> SNMP service...
Abandoned sounds a bit...sad...:)

All I meant to say was that removing a working component (although it 
requires to be made robust though) might be a bit extreme as it is 
perfectly fine to remove it from official interface spec documents for 
the next major release (and of course mention it in change logs).

Loukik.


--

---------------------------------------------------------------
L o u k i k   K u d a r i m o t i

     * *              Network Engineer
   *     *            City House, 126 - 130, Hills Road
  *                   Cambridge CB2 1PQ, United Kingdom
  *                   WWW: http://www.dante.net
D  A  N  T  E          Tel:+44 1223 371300 Fax:+44 1223 371371