perfsonar development work

["Jeff W. Boote" <>]

Roman Lapacz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> during the last meeting in Cambridge (GN2 workshop) we decided to have 
> two base products in SVN structure: one for client and one for services. 
> Today I came back to this and started analyzing the sources. I came to 
> conclusion that we have some classes that can be used either in clients 
> or services so there was a problem which base I should use (we must 
> remember that our structure must be clear and logical to new developers).

The proposal was:

client-base :   Anything that is needed by both clients and services
service-base :  Anything that is ONLY needed by services

The point was to make the client jar as small as it could be since it will be 
used by many applications. But, to provide all the functionality required to 
write a client application.

If this split is not useful now that you are really looking at the code while 
considering it, then of course it should not be done. I am fine with either 
solution. I just responded because it is clear where the code you are referring 
to should be placed (client-base) if the split is done.

jeff