perfsonar-dev - Re: [pS-dev] Data units stored in MAs
Subject: perfsonar development work
List archive
- From: "Jeff W. Boote" <>
- To:
- Cc: 'Nicolas Simar' <>, 'Roman Lapacz' <>,
- Subject: Re: [pS-dev] Data units stored in MAs
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 17:12:05 -0600
Luis,
I was actually wondering if anyone was converting to bits before storing for this reason.
Most RRD/SNMP collections that I have seen do the conversion when displaying the graph instead of during collection. This data is written far more often than it is read, so this is the more economical way. Plus you save some bits of resolution for those faster interfaces this way. ;)
But, this is obviously a reasonable thing to do, and the trade-offs should be available to the data collection software/administrator.
Thanks for the "case in point".
jeff
Luis Marta wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff W. Boote [mailto:] Sent: quarta-feira, 23 de Maio de 2007 23:07
P.S.
I don't really understand why anyone would be putting anything other than octets(bytes) in the RRD files. The SNMP MIB variable is in octets - why mess with it? Can someone tell me what other units are being used for utilization, and what they are using to collect the data so that it ends up in other units?
Hi Jeff.
Usually the utilization graphics are drawn in bits/s, even though the SNMP
MIB variable counters are in octets. We, at FCCN, store utilization in bits/s on the RRDs. We have scripts that
collect the SNMP counters, do the necessary transformation to them, and then
store them in RRDs in bits/s. This way, when a user clicks on a link to see
a graphic, all the CGI that creates it has to do is to get the values stored
in the RRD. Otherwise, we would have to do the transformation at that time.
Regards,
_____________________________________________
Luís Marta
Wg-WAN
FCCN
Av. do Brasil, n.º 101 - Lisboa
Telef. +351 218440100 Fax +351 218472167
www.fccn.pt
Aviso de Confidencialidade
Esta mensagem é exclusivamente destinada ao seu destinatário, podendo conter
informação CONFIDENCIAL, cuja divulgação está expressamente vedada nos
termos da lei. Caso tenha recepcionado indevidamente esta mensagem,
solicitamos-lhe que nos comunique esse mesmo facto por esta via ou para o
telefone +351 218440100 devendo apagar o seu conteúdo de imediato. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. It may contain
CONFIDENTIAL information protected by law. If this message has been received
by error, please notify us via e-mail or by telephone +351 218440100 and
delete it immediately.
- Data units stored in MAs, Nicolas Simar, 05/23/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] Data units stored in MAs, Roman Lapacz, 05/23/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] Data units stored in MAs, Nicolas Simar, 05/23/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] Data units stored in MAs, Jeff W. Boote, 05/23/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] Data units stored in MAs, Nicolas Simar, 05/24/2007
- RE: [pS-dev] Data units stored in MAs, Luis Marta, 05/24/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] Data units stored in MAs, Martin Swany, 05/24/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] Data units stored in MAs, Jeff W. Boote, 05/24/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] Data units stored in MAs, Jeff W. Boote, 05/24/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] Data units stored in MAs, Martin Swany, 05/24/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] Data units stored in MAs, Szymon Trocha, 05/25/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] Data units stored in MAs, Jeff W. Boote, 05/23/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] Data units stored in MAs, Jeff W. Boote, 05/23/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] Data units stored in MAs, Nicolas Simar, 05/24/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] Data units stored in MAs, Jeff W. Boote, 05/24/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] Data units stored in MAs, Roman Lapacz, 05/24/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] Data units stored in MAs, Nicolas Simar, 05/24/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] Data units stored in MAs, Nicolas Simar, 05/23/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] Data units stored in MAs, Martin Swany, 05/24/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] Data units stored in MAs, Roman Lapacz, 05/23/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.