perfsonar development work

["Jeff W. Boote" <>]

Roman Lapacz wrote:
> Jeff W. Boote wrote:
> > Yes - the metadataIdRef of the 'subject' element should be used here. 
> > We have called this 'filter-chaining' in the past, but I guess it is 
> > really more of a 'function' step. 'function-chaining'?
>
> Definitely we have to name those two types of chaining (then we could 
> securely use those names in documentation). I propose:
>
> - base-chaining (or merge-chaining)
> - function-chaining
>
> What do you thing?

I think this is fine. The important part is that we have it documented somewhere 
definitive. (The wiki is too malleable.)

> I prefer:
>
> data (trigger) -> cron -> owamp
>
>
> Here, owamp test is the target and main action defined in the request. 
> Cron section contains details how to manage owamp test.
>
> Let's consider example with built-in transformation (I assume 
> transformation details will be in a separate metadata):
>
> data (trigger) -> cron -> transformation-> owamp


Yes - I agree this makes sense.

jeff