Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-dev - Re: [pS-dev] Re: E2Emon NMWG schema update ?

Subject: perfsonar development work

List archive

Re: [pS-dev] Re: E2Emon NMWG schema update ?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jason Zurawski <>
  • To: Mark Yampolskiy <>
  • Cc: Loukik Kudarimoti <>, Martin Swany <>, "Matthias K. Hamm" <>, Roman Lapacz <>, "" <>
  • Subject: Re: [pS-dev] Re: E2Emon NMWG schema update ?
  • Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:10:56 -0400
  • Organization: Internet2

Mark;



Does this solve the issue for light path monitoring protocols that you wrote to me about?
almost. Definition sent by Jason really allow empty data element, BUT it is slightly different to the one you can find under http://anonsvn.internet2.edu/svn/nmwg/trunk/nmwg/schema/rnc/XML_Schema_v03_final.rnc

Jason, could it be that we are looking in different places and speak about two different schemas?


So my question is why does this schema not use the base schema (where I pulled my example from)? Making changes in multiple locations like this is not desirable because of situations (such as this) where what is required works fine in one file, but not in another. I will make the change to this file, but I would highly recommend this other schema be built using techniques to extend the current work.

-jason





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page