perfsonar development work

[Maciej Glowiak <>]

Hi Nina,

Nina Jeliazkova wrote:
> Hi,
>  
> > Yes, you're right. It would be useful. But the way how NMWG classes are 
> > implementes is different. These classes don't use DOM Document. They're 
> > independent objects with functionality of conversion to DOM Document. It 
> > would be useful to have them based on DOM Document. We have had 
> > discussion on that but for now we won't be changing it (it'd be time 
> > consuming and probably would require changes in code of services)
>
> I realize this is not a priority, but I would prefer more generic approach,
> where NMWG define interfaces instead of classes, and then there could be DOM
> based implementation, XOM based implementation, SAX based implementation, you
> name it. 

I fully agree. We shared the idea with Roman and we even wanted to start 
re-implementation. But finally we gave it up because of other 
implementation.

> IMHO, DOM is a real problem when the client is receiving huge amount of data.

Yes. I agree. Perhaps we could pick up on the discussion. Maybe Martin 
and Jason would have a person (student?) who could implement testing 
version based on DOM?

Maciej



--

 --------------------------------------------------------------------
| Maciej Glowiak        Network Research and Development            ||
| 

     Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center ||
| (+48 61) 858 2024          -- skype_id: maciej_psnc   GG: 4526858 ||
 ====================================================================