perfsonar-dev - Re: [GN2-JRA1] [pS-dev] perfSONAR API
Subject: perfsonar development work
List archive
- From: "Nina Jeliazkova" <>
- To: Maciej Glowiak <>, "Jochen Reinwand" <>
- Cc: "" <>, <>
- Subject: Re: [GN2-JRA1] [pS-dev] perfSONAR API
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:28:57 +0300
Hi,
> >
>
> Yes, you're right. It would be useful. But the way how NMWG classes are
> implementes is different. These classes don't use DOM Document. They're
> independent objects with functionality of conversion to DOM Document. It
> would be useful to have them based on DOM Document. We have had
> discussion on that but for now we won't be changing it (it'd be time
> consuming and probably would require changes in code of services)
>
I realize this is not a priority, but I would prefer more generic approach,
where NMWG define interfaces instead of classes, and then there could be DOM
based implementation, XOM based implementation, SAX based implementation, you
name it.
IMHO, DOM is a real problem when the client is receiving huge amount of data.
Best regards,
Nina
- perfSONAR API, Jochen Reinwand, 04/04/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfSONAR API, Maciej Glowiak, 04/05/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfSONAR API, Jochen Reinwand, 04/10/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfSONAR API, Maciej Glowiak, 04/10/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfSONAR API, Jochen Reinwand, 04/10/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfSONAR API, Maciej Glowiak, 04/11/2007
- Re: [GN2-JRA1] [pS-dev] perfSONAR API, Nina Jeliazkova, 04/11/2007
- Re: [GN2-JRA1] [pS-dev] perfSONAR API, Maciej Glowiak, 04/11/2007
- Re: [GN2-JRA1] [pS-dev] perfSONAR API, Nina Jeliazkova, 04/11/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfSONAR API, Maciej Glowiak, 04/11/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfSONAR API, Jochen Reinwand, 04/10/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfSONAR API, Maciej Glowiak, 04/10/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfSONAR API, Jochen Reinwand, 04/10/2007
- Re: [pS-dev] perfSONAR API, Maciej Glowiak, 04/05/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.