perfsonar development work

[Nicolas Simar <>]

Hi,

what is the status about this thread?

Nicolas

Szymon Trocha wrote:
> Loukik Kudarimoti wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I remember that there was a discussion at Montpellier on naming 
> > convention to be used for perfSONAR services. I can't remember what 
> > the outcome was and how it applies to the situation below. Can anybody 
> > please provide some info?
>
>
> I came back to this discussion on 21 Nov. Maciej said that after 
> Montpellier meeting we proposed:
>
> "  service_name.domain
>
> schema, where:
>
> a) service_name means anything (and should be unique in domain scope)
> b) domain is domain name such as "geant.net" or just "geant". I think we
>    still need some hierarchy of domain names."
>
> > For the upcoming 1.1 release, we will have a few services put together 
> > in a bundle. One such service is the RRD MA. I would like to know how 
> > to name this service, what convention to use.
> >
> > For example, can it be: pS-1.1-RRDTypeMA?
> > Can the bundle simply be called perfSONAR-1.1?
>
>
> What if it is not pS bundle but e.g. JRA1 bundle?
>
> Regards,

--
Nicolas
______________________________________________________________________

Nicolas Simar
Network Engineer

DANTE - www.dante.net

Tel - BE: +32 (0) 4 366 93 49
Tel - UK: +44 (0)1223 371 300
Mobile: +44 (0) 7740 176 883

City House, 126-130 Hills Road
Cambridge CB2 1PQ
UK
_____________________________________________________________________