perfsonar development work

[Loukik Kudarimoti <>]

Szymon Trocha wrote:
> Loukik Kudarimoti wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I remember that there was a discussion at Montpellier on naming 
> > convention to be used for perfSONAR services. I can't remember what 
> > the outcome was and how it applies to the situation below. Can 
> > anybody please provide some info?
>
> I came back to this discussion on 21 Nov. Maciej said that after 
> Montpellier meeting we proposed:
>
> "  service_name.domain
>
> schema, where:
>
> a) service_name means anything (and should be unique in domain scope)
> b) domain is domain name such as "geant.net" or just "geant". I think we
>    still need some hierarchy of domain names."
How would this apply for RRD MA, LS and CLMP? Can you give me some 
examples please?
> > For the upcoming 1.1 release, we will have a few services put 
> > together in a bundle. One such service is the RRD MA. I would like to 
> > know how to name this service, what convention to use.
> >
> > For example, can it be: pS-1.1-RRDTypeMA?
> > Can the bundle simply be called perfSONAR-1.1?
>
> What if it is not pS bundle but e.g. JRA1 bundle?
umm..I don't know for sure but can propose something like 
GEANT2-JRA1-pS-x  where x is the version number

> Regards,