perfsonar development work

[Szymon Trocha <>]

Maciej Glowiak wrote:
> Roman Lapacz napisa�(a):
> > Eric L. Boyd wrote:
>
> > > c) Conforming to the naming scheme for services
> > >    ACTION ITEM: Define naming scheme for services. Consider including 
> > > developing institution, development language, service type, tool, 
> > > e.g. DFN-PERL-MA-BWCTL service.
> >
> > Including the name(s) of institution(s) doesn't look good for me. For 
> > example if there are 4 institutions involved: 
> > INTERNET2-DANTE-UoD-PSNC-MP-XXXXX
>
> I agree. My proposal is to split the single name into several fields
> (extended information in metadata) such as:
>
> -serviceType (required, rely on hierarchy like error.codes):
>
>   ma.rrd
>   ma.sql
>   ls.xml
>   ls.uddi
>   mp.snmp
>   mp.cl
>
> -serviceLocation (required, may be hierarchical too):
>
>   abilene
>   abilene.internet2.ann_arbor
>   geant
>   geant.pionier
>
> -implementationLanguage (optional):
>
>   java
>   perl
>   python
>
> -usedTools (optional)
>
>   bwctl,owamp
>   exist-db
>   rrdjtool

Approaching the next release we can go back to this discussion about 
naming schema which Maciej initiated. Any other opinions or proposals?

Regards,
--
Szymon Trocha

Poznan Supercomputing & Ntw. Center ::: NETWORK OPERATION CENTER
Tel. (+48 61) 8582022
http://noc.man.poznan.pl  ::: http://noc.pionier.gov.pl