perfsonar development work

[Uros Juvan <>]

What about changing the way Parameters class stores parameters to it's 
HashMap. Not just as HashMap<String, String>, but as HashMap<String, 
String[]>.
We can make this compatible with classes using this class, by returning 
String[0] on call to existing methods, and adding extra method for 
returning array of String's.

Roman Lapacz wrote:
> Martin Swany wrote:
> > Hi Roman,
> >
> > > Jason, could you take look at this? What's your opinion on this? 
> > > Others?
> >
> > We had a assumed that they parameter names would be unique
> > so that we could use the HashMap. To me, this argues for a
> > "complex" parameter (that is not just a string.) 
>
> I believe that such new approach to parameters could be useful also in 
> other situations.
>
>
> Roman
>
> > Then, the parameter
> > could be a SupportedEventTypes or something similar.
> >
> > best,
> > martin

Regards,

--
Uroš Juvan
Arnes