perfsonar-dev - Re: [pS-dev] Java 0.1 (EGEE tag) vs. perfSONAR-1.0 RRD MA performance
Subject: perfsonar development work
List archive
- From: Roman Lapacz <>
- To: Vedrin Jeliazkov <>
- Cc: , Nicolas Simar <>, Eric Boyd <>, "Jeff W. Boote" <>
- Subject: Re: [pS-dev] Java 0.1 (EGEE tag) vs. perfSONAR-1.0 RRD MA performance
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:41:39 +0200
Vedrin Jeliazkov wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I've run some simple tests against the upgraded RRD MA at ESnet
Do they use eXist to store the metadata configuration file?
in an attempt
to compare its performance against the older release. Here are the timings
I've got:
1. One MetadataKeyRequest (summary) [sec]
2. Number of Interfaces (NoI)
3. (NoI x 2) SetupDataRequests (detailed summary) [sec]
4. Average SetupDataRequest [msec]
5. Average Link latency (RTT) [msec]
6. Implementation
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
ESNET 180 415 468 564 202 Java 0.1 (EGEE tag)
ESNET 296 419 1600 1909 206 perfSONAR-1.0
Unfortunately the release 1.0 does not contain recent changes, which I hope, improve the performance. It would be interesting to see the tests of RRD MA from svn trunk or the next release (question to the release team: is there a timetable for this?).
BTW. Vedrin, are you a member of the release team? (I remember the discussion in Cambridge with the decision to ask you to have you there as you are a very active perfSONAR member).
Roman
As you can see, the differences in the number of interfaces and the network
latency are insignificant, while MetadataKeyRequest's and SetupDataREquest's
processing time is much longer in the new service version, when compared to
the older one (multiplied by 1.6 and 3.4 respectively).
If the service is running on the same hardware platform, than we could
conclude that there is a significant performance loss in the new version,
which is most probably due to some newly introduced scalability issue. Perhaps
some more comprehensive tests should be run in order to understand and resolve
this issue.
Kind regards,
Vedrin
- Java 0.1 (EGEE tag) vs. perfSONAR-1.0 RRD MA performance, Vedrin Jeliazkov, 08/23/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 0.1 (EGEE tag) vs. perfSONAR-1.0 RRD MA performance, Roman Lapacz, 08/24/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 0.1 (EGEE tag) vs. perfSONAR-1.0 RRD MA performance, Loukik Kudarimoti, 08/24/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 0.1 (EGEE tag) vs. perfSONAR-1.0 RRD MA performance, Vedrin Jeliazkov, 08/24/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 0.1 (EGEE tag) vs. perfSONAR-1.0 RRD MA performance, Loukik Kudarimoti, 08/24/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 0.1 (EGEE tag) vs. perfSONAR-1.0 RRD MA performance, Vedrin Jeliazkov, 08/24/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 0.1 (EGEE tag) vs. perfSONAR-1.0 RRD MA performance, Vedrin Jeliazkov, 08/24/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 0.1 (EGEE tag) vs. perfSONAR-1.0 RRD MA performance, Jeff W. Boote, 08/24/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 0.1 (EGEE tag) vs. perfSONAR-1.0 RRD MA performance, Roman Lapacz, 08/25/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 0.1 (EGEE tag) vs. perfSONAR-1.0 RRD MA performance, Vedrin Jeliazkov, 08/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 0.1 (EGEE tag) vs. perfSONAR-1.0 RRD MA performance, Roman Lapacz, 08/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 0.1 (EGEE tag) vs. perfSONAR-1.0 RRD MA performance, Maciej Glowiak, 08/30/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 0.1 (EGEE tag) vs. perfSONAR-1.0 RRD MA performance, Vedrin Jeliazkov, 08/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 0.1 (EGEE tag) vs. perfSONAR-1.0 RRD MA performance, Roman Lapacz, 08/25/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 0.1 (EGEE tag) vs. perfSONAR-1.0 RRD MA performance, Loukik Kudarimoti, 08/24/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 0.1 (EGEE tag) vs. perfSONAR-1.0 RRD MA performance, Joe Metzger, 08/24/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 0.1 (EGEE tag) vs. perfSONAR-1.0 RRD MA performance, Roman Lapacz, 08/24/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.