Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ntacpeering - Re: Notes from NTAC Peering and Routing call

Subject: NTAC Peering Working Group

List archive

Re: Notes from NTAC Peering and Routing call


Chronological Thread 
    < Chronological >      < Thread >
  • From: Bill Owens <>
  • To: Jeff Bartig <>, Matt Valenzisi <>
  • Cc: Dan Schmiedt <>, "" <>
  • Subject: Re: Notes from NTAC Peering and Routing call
  • Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 20:08:44 +0000
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nysernet.org; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nysernet.org; dkim=pass header.d=nysernet.org; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=tmFYm/QAWkKOmDgiVvJrHTJ/61sWa7N5ar7DgW7njyQ=; b=kY+eKzHC1JkS0BXwZTPspwVFXC3OmKcNtqYzBzHO6Lncl/Z1XZu/D/m7k2NnhAyWUDmZH9WONh+RWAzuCPPQJvNlEXxLBxxTW7vLHQPCTmy8OAdGJuFrw4tr3VaWGcGtJfAV5GoAZVb2VFi7cLxz0b2c3AUR9WJ5JW/qBwZgnXV3StayKQRo/p0yar1sXnygXVXsqBnGZnnqD5ao+1usn9etS/yUttZHyctt3xWAdRz30iTnVk/MMtCuDZINdD9EYMtXdsINeOYVsXwwegMDxVyirK9bnrl1cgF44EYUnJpA9qsPpYdIDWkzm2JSET4kej+uUBNW/Q0ittCqrAzgcA==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=CyOphZO31pCpt/pylAZnJqVvriKW9iHDsaLDkAtftKP1BNaaD1YwIcF8oQ+qUnE04GhU7Kt1CEh41WZkg00cdZhU+Kx9HGZsK3pqa7pn6LeGwDUw7lqtXc3N80ofYIVy2gLONBsFfkJdIHuyO4BqsHcPExV6BVfAFYTCYSrsllDtqn19zo75F031rdzkP1kpHiMlC/SUHoCN4BFHy+9okecv0pqkDm+0r7jjM5YUQxELTA5my0e1LTH+s0KKIZMcPIa+g/EJ0dzyNnB3sBFd6RGRx8Bk6gUh4lTJo7FbCuBqQViYFRBJCsh937OtlkJqEVSHUIgH5orm0PD8qI/hzQ==

We peer with all those except Roblox and G-Core, because our eSports folks told us they didn’t care about them. We don’t connect too many K-12s, and apparently nobody in NYSERNet plays World of Tanks competitively (though I should ask again in case some has started it). To that list we added Ubisoft (22634) for Rainbow Six Siege.

 

Our eSports folks said that none of them are significant bandwidth except for Twitch, which can be huge especially if there’s a formal arena on campus. Most of them have a dedicated video streaming station controlled by the coach during a tournament, and individual players also stream on their own (monetized) channels. One of our campuses had to limit that during tournament play until we were able to give them a bigger pipe to Twitch.

 

Bill.

 

From: <> on behalf of Jeff Bartig <>
Reply-To: Jeff Bartig <>
Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 at 11:24 PM
To: Matt Valenzisi <>
Cc: Dan Schmiedt <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: Notes from NTAC Peering and Routing call

 


Matt,

Here is an initial list of the eSports related networks I plan to talk with about establishing peering with I2PX.  The bottom two, G-Core and i3D.net, are already completed.

I'm interested in adding more to this list, if anyone has additional networks we should be considering.  The existing list was generated from requests I've been receiving from I2PX participants and from a quick search of peeringdb.com for networks that mention gaming.

Jeff

Peer Network

ASN

Comments

Twitch

46489

the youtube of gaming

Valve

32590

Steam

Sony PlayStation

33353

 

Blizzard Entertainment

57976

World of Warcraft

Roblox

22697

elementary/middleschool

Riot Games

6507

League of Legends

G-Core Labs

199524

World of Tanks

i3D.net

49544

 



Matt Valenzisi wrote on 1/21/20 7:27 PM:

Hello Everyone:
 
Does anyone have a comprehensive list of E-Sports entities and their
associated ASNs already compiled? If so, and you'd be willing to
share, that would be great.
 
Thanks in advance,
Matt
MCNC
 
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 5:14 PM Dan Schmiedt  wrote:
Hey all,
 
Find attached my notes from today's NTAC Peering & Routing call.  Apologies in advance for my mistakes and omissions; send me your corrections.
 
-Dan

 

--
Jeff Bartig
Interconnection Architect
Internet2  AS11164 / AS11537
+1-608-616-9908


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page