ntacpeering - Re: No route6 object for 2001:468::/32
Subject: NTAC Peering Working Group
List archive
- From: Jeff Bartig <>
- To: David Farmer <>
- Cc: I2 IPv6 working group <>,
- Subject: Re: No route6 object for 2001:468::/32
- Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 16:45:35 -0600
- Authentication-results: umn.edu; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;umn.edu; dmarc=none action=none header.from=internet2.edu;
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:0
On 1/2/18, 1:18
PM, David Farmer wrote:
Hi Dave, I believe all of the items you note above and others I found have been cleaned up. RADB updates should be live. ARIN updates might take a while to become visible via whois. There are no plans to advertise the aggregate 163.253.0.0/16 route, but I did add a route object just to provide a default origin for any more specifics that do get advertised. I also created route objects for all of the more specifics that already exist under 163.253.0.0/16. Jeff |
- No route6 object for 2001:468::/32, David Farmer, 01/02/2018
- Re: No route6 object for 2001:468::/32, Michael H Lambert, 01/02/2018
- Re: No route6 object for 2001:468::/32, David Farmer, 01/02/2018
- Re: No route6 object for 2001:468::/32, Bill Owens, 01/02/2018
- Re: No route6 object for 2001:468::/32, David Farmer, 01/02/2018
- Re: No route6 object for 2001:468::/32, Jeff Bartig, 01/03/2018
- Re: No route6 object for 2001:468::/32, David Farmer, 01/03/2018
- Re: No route6 object for 2001:468::/32, Michael H Lambert, 01/02/2018
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.