Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ntacpeering - Re: No route6 object for 2001:468::/32

Subject: NTAC Peering Working Group

List archive

Re: No route6 object for 2001:468::/32


Chronological Thread 
  • From: David Farmer <>
  • To: Michael H Lambert <>
  • Cc: I2 IPv6 working group <>,
  • Subject: Re: No route6 object for 2001:468::/32
  • Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 13:40:20 -0600
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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

I have it on good authority some will be working on it soon. :)

Thanks.

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Michael H Lambert <> wrote:
Given the historical resistance (maybe too strong a choice of words, but
it gives the right sense) of the GRNOC to routing registries, I'm not
all that surprised.  I agree that this issue SHOULD be fixed.

Michael

David Farmer wrote:
> There is no route6 object anywhere for 2001:468::/32.
>
> This is probably because 2001:468::/32 was being routed long before
> route6 objects existed. So, It would probably be a good idea for someone
> within Internet2 or the NOC to fix this by create a route6 object for it
> or add an "Origin AS" within ARIN Online.
>
> While I was at it, I looked at IPv4 too;
>
> For 162.252.68.0/22 <http://162.252.68.0/22>, 162.244.104.0/21
> <http://162.244.104.0/21> and 198.71.44.0/22 <http://198.71.44.0/22> all
> have "Origin AS" within ARIN Whois.
>
> For 163.253.0.0/16 <http://163.253.0.0/16>, all but one sub block that
> is routed has a route object in RADB, but nothing for the aggregate /16,
> but maybe that is the way it should be.
>
> For 64.57.16.0/20 <http://64.57.16.0/20>, there is no route object or
> "Origin AS" within ARIN Whois.  So, It would probably be a good idea for
> someone within Internet2 or the NOC to fix this too.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> ===============================================
> David Farmer               
> <mailto:>
> Networking & Telecommunication Services
> Office of Information Technology
> University of Minnesota
> 2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
> Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
> ===============================================


--
Michael H Lambert, GigaPoP Manager             Phone: +1 412 268-4960
Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center/3ROX          FAX:   +1 412 268-5832
300 S Craig St, Pittsburgh, PA  15213 USA     




--
===============================================
David Farmer              
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota  
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page