Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

netsec-sig - Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Anti-Spoofing/uRPF discussion summary from Technology Exchange

Subject: Internet2 Network Security SIG

List archive

Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Anti-Spoofing/uRPF discussion summary from Technology Exchange


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Pete Siemsen <>
  • To:
  • Cc: "" <>, "" <>
  • Subject: Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Anti-Spoofing/uRPF discussion summary from Technology Exchange
  • Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:57:48 -0700
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
IPv6 always lags behind :-) Few of the FRGP customers have IPv6. The short answer is "No".


-- Pete


On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 6:08 PM, John Kristoff <> wrote:
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 22:01:34 +0000
Pete Siemsen <> wrote:

> . We plan to put uRPF on all interfaces - nobody gets to opt-out

Will all this be consistently done for IPv6 traffic as well?

John


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page