netsec-sig - Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results
Subject: Internet2 Network Security SIG
List archive
- From: gcbrowni <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 11:12:45 -0500
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
Absolutly.
I think our target list is Juniper, Cisco (multiple types) and Brocade.
Anything else have enough traction to put effort in to? ALU?
> On Dec 2, 2016, at 11:11 AM, Michael H Lambert
> <>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2 Dec 2016, at 10:58, gcbrowni
>> <>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, we are ABSOLTLY going to do more than just BGP/179 & iBGP edge
>> filtering. I suspect we’ll do guides on most of the topic areas, it’s only
>> a matter of which we do first.
>>
>> The Juniper code suggestions are going to be very valuable. Helping people
>> implement these in a easy way is going to be an important part of the
>> guides. I just hope that the Cisco versions are going to be an easy …
>
> And even though Internet2 has not had them in the routing path, Brocades
> are undoubtedly important, too.
>
> Michael
>
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results, gcbrowni, 12/01/2016
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results, John Kristoff, 12/01/2016
- RE: [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results, Michael Hare, 12/01/2016
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results, Brad Fleming, 12/01/2016
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results, gcbrowni, 12/02/2016
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results, Michael H Lambert, 12/02/2016
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results, gcbrowni, 12/02/2016
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results, Dale W. Carder, 12/02/2016
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results, gcbrowni, 12/02/2016
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results, Michael H Lambert, 12/02/2016
- RE: [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results, Michael Hare, 12/01/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.