netsec-sig - [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results
Subject: Internet2 Network Security SIG
List archive
- From: gcbrowni <>
- To:
- Subject: [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results
- Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 09:51:53 -0500
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
Thank you, everyone who completed the survey. Truly my most rewarding
experiences in R&E generally come from the sorts of discussions that the
comments in the survey are a part of.
We had 17 responders, with 14 end sites and 3 transit providers. I’ve attched
the spreadsheet (after an excel pivot.) The numeric columns have the end site
before the slash and the transit providers after the slash. Take some time
and look through the numbers and comments.
Based on the SHOULD/MUST column, it would seem that we should start with a
discussion paper on filter BGP/tcp-179 and then maybe iBGP edge filtering?
How’s that sound, or does anyone have some alternatre suggestions?
-Grover
Attachment:
I2 Routing Survey results-gcb.xlsx
Description: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results, gcbrowni, 12/01/2016
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results, John Kristoff, 12/01/2016
- RE: [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results, Michael Hare, 12/01/2016
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results, Brad Fleming, 12/01/2016
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results, gcbrowni, 12/02/2016
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results, Michael H Lambert, 12/02/2016
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results, gcbrowni, 12/02/2016
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results, Dale W. Carder, 12/02/2016
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results, gcbrowni, 12/02/2016
- Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results, Michael H Lambert, 12/02/2016
- RE: [Security-WG] I2 - Routing security survey results, Michael Hare, 12/01/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.