Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

netsec-sig - Re: [Security-WG] proposed agenda for next meeting...

Subject: Internet2 Network Security SIG

List archive

Re: [Security-WG] proposed agenda for next meeting...


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Frank Seesink <>
  • To: Steven Wallace <>
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: [Security-WG] proposed agenda for next meeting...
  • Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 13:06:36 -0500

Steve,

Agenda sounds good to me.  Is there a date/time for the next meeting/call?

I don’t have anything on my calendar, and skimming through the mailing list, I don’t see where we ever set a definitive schedule for regular meetings.  I see emails back in June suggesting a possible time (2nd or 4th Tuesdays of the month at 1:-2:PM PDT (4:-5:PM EDT)), but no agreement/determination.  Each call has been scheduled mostly as one-off’s with Paul Howell sending out announcements.

Apologies in advance if this is something that’s been discussed/mentioned in the general NTAC calls or elsewhere.  I haven’t been on those calls or any general NTAC mailing list if there is one.

[Speaking of which, I Googled to find info on NTAC itself, and initially landed here:

This took me to the wiki here:

This in turn said the info had been moved to spaces.internet2.edu, and eventually found this page:

To anyone who is actively in the NTAC, is this accurate/the most recent?  I only ask because the "NTAC Meetings and Calls” link shows that the most recent notes are from Sep. 2013, and in general the most recent data on this site appears about 2 years old.]


P.S. I notice that the security WG mailing list is configured such that if you simply hit [Reply], you reply to the sender/originator, not the list.  Hence I did a [Reply All] so it went to you and the list (apologies if it gives you a double post).  But wasn’t sure whether the reason I haven’t seen anyone else responding to your proposed agenda is because no one has, or everyone is simply replying and it’s just going directly to you.  [Always a joy with mailing lists.  Do you make the default that replies go to the list or to the originator.  For general discussion lists like this I usually configure the default to be that replies go to the list, whereas notification mailing lists are set to by default to go to the originator.  But that’s just me.]


On Nov 4, 2015, at 5:58 PM, Steven Wallace <> wrote:

It would be good to have a regular meeting before we schedule another vendor. Here’s a proposed agenda. Please let me know what you think.

thanks,

ssw



  • Agenda bash
  • Internet2 update - Grateful if Paul and/or rob could provide an update concerning the WG’s recommendations and other I2 security plans
  • DaleC, could you share your experience with GRNET’s FoD?
  • IU’s plans for reaching out to Arbor
  • What’’s the next step WRT information collected from DDoS mitigation




Frank Seesink

Telecommunications Network Specialist III
West Virginia Network (WVNET)
304.293.5192 x241





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page