netsec-sig - RE: [Security-WG] next DDoS mitigation steps...
Subject: Internet2 Network Security SIG
List archive
- From: "Schopis, Paul" <>
- To: Steven Wallace <>, "" <>
- Cc: Jen Leasure <>, Luke Fowler <>, "Caroline Weilhamer" <>, Steve Cotter <>, "" <>, "" <>, "" <>, "" <>, Jon-Paul Herron <>
- Subject: RE: [Security-WG] next DDoS mitigation steps...
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 14:23:04 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 164.107.81.216) smtp.mailfrom=oar.net; dante.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dante.net; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=oar.net;
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
Steve, I think your suggestions are spot on. Count me in.
Paul From: [mailto:]
On Behalf Of Steven Wallace I propose that the working group consider the following next steps WRT moving forward with DDoS mitigation capabilities:
A bit more about my thinking. IMO, exploring vended solutions is compliment to approaches such as UTRS & RTBH FlowSpec. Most RONs will likely so a bit of both. As we move forward, Internet2 will benefit form the community’s experience. Who’s interested? thanks, ssw P.S. For the GEANT folks, I’ve attached the set of recommendations that the Internet2 Security working group developed in response to the I2’s network group. Hopefully this will provide a bit of context. |
- [Security-WG] next DDoS mitigation steps..., Steven Wallace, 11/02/2015
- RE: [Security-WG] next DDoS mitigation steps..., Schopis, Paul, 11/03/2015
- Re: [Security-WG] next DDoS mitigation steps..., Frank Seesink, 11/03/2015
- Re: [Security-WG] next DDoS mitigation steps..., Dale W. Carder, 11/03/2015
- Re: [Security-WG] next DDoS mitigation steps..., Frank Seesink, 11/03/2015
- RE: [Security-WG] next DDoS mitigation steps..., Schopis, Paul, 11/03/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.