ndt-dev - Re: [ndt-dev] Investigate the possible use of TCP_INFO instead of web100/web10g
Subject: NDT-DEV email list created
List archive
Re: [ndt-dev] Investigate the possible use of TCP_INFO instead of web100/web10g
Chronological Thread
- From: Sebastian Malecki <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [ndt-dev] Investigate the possible use of TCP_INFO instead of web100/web10g
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 11:10:31 +0000 (UTC)
Hi!
Continuing the previous thread, I investigated, which function could work
without web100/10g. It's not much, but in future could be use to create some
light NDT.
As i wrote on wiki page
(https://code.google.com/p/ndt/wiki/TCP_INFOvsWeb100Web10g#Function_work_witho
ut_Web100/10g) it,s:
- C2S throughput test
- S2C throughput test
- Detect S2C & C2S throughput test: Packet queuing
- Simple firewall test (after little change in calculate testTime)
- Connection type (in client)
Rest is depend from Web100/10g specific variables.
Regards,
Sebastian Malecki
- Re: [ndt-dev] Investigate the possible use of TCP_INFO instead of web100/web10g, Sebastian Malecki, 07/02/2014
- Re: [ndt-dev] Investigate the possible use of TCP_INFO instead of web100/web10g, Aaron Brown, 07/02/2014
- Re: [ndt-dev] Investigate the possible use of TCP_INFO instead of web100/web10g, Sebastian Malecki, 07/07/2014
- Re: [ndt-dev] Investigate the possible use of TCP_INFO instead of web100/web10g, Sebastian Malecki, 07/30/2014
- Re: [ndt-dev] Investigate the possible use of TCP_INFO instead of web100/web10g, Aaron Brown, 07/02/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.