ndt-dev - [ndt-dev] web100/web10g cleanups
Subject: NDT-DEV email list created
List archive
- From: Aaron Brown <>
- To: "<>" <>
- Subject: [ndt-dev] web100/web10g cleanups
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:55:39 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
Hey Folks,
While sitting at home on paternity leave, I did some cleanups of the
web100/web10g stuff to make it a bit easier to read. My changes are located
in the aaron-tcp_stats_cleanup branch. The individual commits are:
https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/detail?r=988
https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/detail?r=989
https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/detail?r=990
https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/detail?r=991
https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/detail?r=992
https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/detail?r=993
https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/detail?r=994
https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/detail?r=995
https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/detail?r=996
https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/detail?r=997
https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/detail?r=998
https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/detail?r=999
https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/detail?r=1000
https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/detail?r=1001
https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/detail?r=1002
If folks could read through to make sure I’m not doing anything too
outlandish or wrong, that’d be good. It’d be especially good in the web10g
case since I don’t have a web10g box to play with :)
I think further cleanups would be good. In the best case scenario, I think
the web100/web10g interface would be consolidated so that the general code
would just know that it was collecting tcp stats, not how it was collecting
them.
Cheers,
Aaron
- [ndt-dev] web100/web10g cleanups, Aaron Brown, 03/10/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.