ndt-dev - [ndt-dev] Re: Comment on revision r916 in ndt
Subject: NDT-DEV email list created
List archive
- From:
- To:
- Subject: [ndt-dev] Re: Comment on revision r916 in ndt
- Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:02:07 +0000
Comment by
:
General Comment:
That's a very good question. That's what I had at first. I assumed that gcc would know what to do with those expressions (which is a huge leap in certain cases ;-)). I ended up with this version since I *thought* it looked cleaner, but I'm (obviously) okay with either way. Just say the word and I'll make the change.
For more information:
https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/detail?r=916
- [ndt-dev] Comment on revision r916 in ndt, ndt, 02/20/2014
- [ndt-dev] Re: Comment on revision r916 in ndt, ndt, 02/20/2014
- [ndt-dev] Re: Comment on revision r916 in ndt, ndt, 02/20/2014
- [ndt-dev] Re: Comment on revision r916 in ndt, ndt, 02/20/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.