NDT-DEV email list created

[Sebastian Malecki <>]

According to thread https://code.google.com/p/ndt/issues/detail?id=102, I
would like to discuss about which statuses should be send by server.

1. "9999 - Server Busy: Please wait 60 seconds for previous test to finish" -
should it be? 
At first I will try explain why client should still handle "9999" message.
It's because of version compatibility. I look at review history and to the
rev.340 server sent "9999", so in my opinion it should still be handle to be
compatibility with previous server version. 
I'm not sure if it should be send from anywhere by server now.

2. "9988" or "9977"?
For now "9988" means "Server Busy: Too many clients waiting in server queue. 
Please try again later". The comparison with max client allowed is at 
https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/browse/trunk/src/web100srv.c#2291 
and it's good.

At present version i propose to change some "9988" to "9977" - (Server fault):
https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/browse/trunk/src/web100srv.c#2030
https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/browse/trunk/src/web100srv.c#2049
https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/browse/trunk/src/web100srv.c#2083

3. SRV_QUEUE messages in previous review.
In other hand, at rev.340 we can see that someone (rcarlson501) try to add
some other flag: 9444, 9666 but in rev.341 cancelled it and changed everything
for 9988, what is for now. Maybe someone remember that times and could explain
if it was intentional action.

Rev.340:
https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/detail?r=340&path=/trunk/src/web100srv.c
Rev.341: 
https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/detail?r=341&path=/trunk/src/web100srv.c

Wiki about SRV_QUEUE messages is poor:
https://code.google.com/p/ndt/wiki/NDTProtocol#Queuing_clients

Do you have any suggestion, ideas or sth? Should we change anything?

Hope, you understand
Sebastian