ndt-dev - Re: [ndt-dev] Replacing sprintf with snprintf
Subject: NDT-DEV email list created
List archive
- From: Dominic Hamon <>
- To: Aaron Brown <>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [ndt-dev] Replacing sprintf with snprintf
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:48:30 -0700
That's possible for those that are defined as array types. However, for those that are defined within a function as raw pointers, this would not work as they would have sizeof(char*). I'll rework the patch to clean the static ones up.
Dominic Hamon | Measurement Lab
Dominic Hamon | Measurement Lab
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Aaron Brown <> wrote:
Since all of the buffers are static sized, why not do:+ snprintf(tmpstr, sizeof(tmpstr), "%s/%s", BASEDIR, LOGFILE);instead of+ snprintf(tmpstr, TMPSTR_STRLEN, "%s/%s", BASEDIR, LOGFILE);Gets rid of the #define's for temporary thingsCheers,AaronOn Oct 31, 2012, at 5:30 PM, Dominic Hamon <> wrote:<ndt-sprintf.patch>Hi
I noticed that there were a few instances of sprintf in the codebase that weren't taking into account the destination buffer's size. This seemed a little dangerous to me as buffer runs can lead to invalid data as well as buffer overflow attacks.Attached is a patch that replaces every sprintf instance with a call to sprintf.
Dominic Hamon | Measurement Lab
TIP2013, University of Hawaii Mānoa
January 13 - January 17, 2013, Honolulu, HI
http://events.internet2.edu/2013/tip/
- [ndt-dev] Replacing sprintf with snprintf, Dominic Hamon, 10/31/2012
- Re: [ndt-dev] Replacing sprintf with snprintf, Aaron Brown, 10/31/2012
- Re: [ndt-dev] Replacing sprintf with snprintf, Dominic Hamon, 10/31/2012
- Re: [ndt-dev] Replacing sprintf with snprintf, Aaron Brown, 10/31/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.