NDT-DEV email list created

[Thomas Gideon <>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

(Apologies for the re-send, didn't realize my MUA sent that last one
from my personal address not my work one.)

I thought I was already subscribed. Trying to subscribe again sent me a
password change message. Looking at the archives, there has been
activity I should have been receiving. I can run this down on my end, we
have an unpublished spam black list that may have simply dropped these
messages.

I have also been corresponding with Jeff about these changes and have
rolled back commits for them and moved them onto a branch for the time
being. I am working with him to figure out how best to coordinate a
release of these changes, once I have completed and tested them.


- -T

On 08/05/2011 01:48 PM, Jason Zurawski wrote:
> On 8/5/11 1:45 PM, thus spake Tiziana Refice:
>> Jason,
>> 
>> Good point. I was not aware of the ndt-dev ml.
>> 
>> Is there anybody in particular we should contact, to make sure the 
>> proposed change does not conflict with anybody else's work?
> 
> I would suggest using the mailing list:
> 
> https://lists.internet2.edu/sympa/subscribe/ndt-dev
> 
> Thanks;
> 
> -jason
> 
>> --Tiziana
>> 
>> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:43, Jason Zurawski 
>> <
>>  
>> <mailto:>>
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> Colliding two worlds.
>> 
>> In the future mlab-ops should be sure to let ndt-dev know of 
>> changes like this since there are a lot more hands in the ndt code 
>> these days.
>> 
>> -jason
>> 
>> On 8/2/11 3:41 PM, thus spake Tiziana Refice:
>> 
>> I briefly chatted with Thomas a few days ago and he said he could 
>> do it (with some help from you) by the end of this week.
>> 
>> @Thomas, Is it still the case?
>> 
>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:44, Josh King 
>> <
>>  
>> <mailto:>
>>  
>> <mailto:
>>  
>> <mailto:>>>
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Tiziana,
>> 
>> I think this sounds like a great idea. These are pretty simple 
>> changes that I could probably make pretty easily, but as I'll be 
>> out of town for the first half of next week I'm not sure if I'll 
>> have time to do it on that timeframe, so if someone else is able
>> to to they should feel free to take pass at it.
>> 
>> On 08/01/2011 01:43 PM, Tiziana Refice wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> To make it easier to analyze the data collected by NDT, I
>> suggest to modify
>>> the NDT client to log the application that runs a test. This way 
>>> it will be possible to tell from the logs that a
>> specific test
>>> result was collected by a specific application (e.g.,
>> uTorrent, M-Lab web
>>> site, Android app, FCC client, ...).
>>> 
>>> In particular, I suggest to log such info in the meta file. This 
>>> is the file that writes the meta file (
>>> 
>> 
>> http://www.google.com/__codesearch#3CG7BnVocJs/trunk/__src/logging.c&q=log%20package:__http://ndt%5C.googlecode%5C.__com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 
<http://www.google.com/codesearch#3CG7BnVocJs/trunk/src/logging.c&q=log%20package:http://ndt%5C.googlecode%5C.com>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> <http://www.google.com/__codesearch#3CG7BnVocJs/trunk/__src/logging.c&q=log%20package:__http://ndt%5C.googlecode%5C.__com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 
<http://www.google.com/codesearch#3CG7BnVocJs/trunk/src/logging.c&q=log%20package:http://ndt%5C.googlecode%5C.com>>),
>> 
>> 
>> 
> function writeMeta().
>>> For example, we could add an extra line after line 553,
>> something like
>>> fprintf(fp, "client application: %s\n", meta.application); where 
>>> meta.application could be initialized from some
>> property file.
>>> 
>>> What do you think?
>>> 
>>> The goal is to make the change by the beginning of next week.
>>> 
>>> In addition, I wonder if it would make sense to also log the
>> version of the
>>> NDT client.
>>> 
>>> Cheers, --Tiziana
>>> 
>> 
>> -- Josh King Technologist Open Technology Initiative New America 
>> Foundation
> 
> _______________________________________________ M-lab-ops mailing 
> list 
> 
>  
> http://mail.measurementlab.net/mailman/listinfo/m-lab-ops_measurementlab.net
>
>
- --
> 
Thomas Gideon
Sr. Staff Technologist, Open Technology Initiative
New America Foundation
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEAREIAAYFAk48MEAACgkQ65xMDm9EZnMhKQCfQAC35BCY1gK/du0emVJkpDG0
RdUAoKNECJqHsizSXBSAPyDV1eWLRn+o
=ING5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----