mace-opensaml-users - SAML2HTTPRedirectDeflateSignatureRule
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: rangeli nepal <>
- To:
- Subject: SAML2HTTPRedirectDeflateSignatureRule
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 22:18:45 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=HfULQYvvvOdiQrsWhs8JOufh+jGIiOVe2sz1fma4A5GQAWD9ZDWsX9nWuqoB5Bsjmm tixMfRuONodCouA54G8l/U/BLvIXDdFUMOjnYIAHeKqVYihBwAadDNiElU1CcEXk5fec Uy6kJmvmmvJbkxvg6CsF+9mo+CVlARAtTI8cU=
Currently I am using SAML2HTTPRedirectDeflateSignatureRule and SAML2HTTPPostSimpleSignRule with metadata. Both works for me. Now I am trying to understand how they work :).
I think they try to build signature from metadata provided credential(X509Certificate) and Message specified credential and compare them?
Any explanation will be highly appreciated.
Thank you.
rn
- SAML2HTTPRedirectDeflateSignatureRule, rangeli nepal, 05/26/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] SAML2HTTPRedirectDeflateSignatureRule, Brent Putman, 05/26/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] SAML2HTTPRedirectDeflateSignatureRule, Brent Putman, 05/27/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] SAML2HTTPRedirectDeflateSignatureRule, rangeli nepal, 05/27/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] SAML2HTTPRedirectDeflateSignatureRule, Chad La Joie, 05/27/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] SAML2HTTPRedirectDeflateSignatureRule, rangeli nepal, 05/28/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] SAML2HTTPRedirectDeflateSignatureRule, Chad La Joie, 05/27/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] SAML2HTTPRedirectDeflateSignatureRule, rangeli nepal, 05/27/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.