OpenSAML user discussion

["Jason Countryman" <>]

Thank you all for your help.  I decided not to use custom ContentReference.

Thanks

______________________________
Jason T. Countryman
Programmer
Community Computer Service


---------- Original Message -----------
From: Brent Putman <>
To:
Sent: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:05:19 -0400
Subject: Re: [OpenSAML] adding custom ContentReference to a signature

> On 4/9/2010 2:50 PM, Scott Cantor wrote:
> >>  But
> >> unless you really care about the difference between the exclusive c14 with
> >> vs. without comments, the defaults are exactly what you have above.
> >>    
> > The distinction on that actually will have no effect and comments will never be signed in either case. The reasons why are esoteric, but just trust me on it.
> >  
>
> Ok.  Of course our xmltooling code doesn't preserve comments anyway, so
> I guess the distinction is doubly moot.
------- End of Original Message -------

This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, SpamAssassin & ClamAV.

This message and any attachments may contain information that is protected by law as privileged and confidential, and
is transmitted for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any use, dissemination, copying or retention of this e-mail or the information contained herein is strictly prohibited.
If you received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail, and permanently delete this e-mail.