mace-opensaml-users - Re: [OpenSAML] adding custom ContentReference to a signature
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Brent Putman <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [OpenSAML] adding custom ContentReference to a signature
- Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:05:19 -0400
On 4/9/2010 2:50 PM, Scott Cantor wrote:
>> But
>> unless you really care about the difference between the exclusive c14 with
>> vs. without comments, the defaults are exactly what you have above.
>>
> The distinction on that actually will have no effect and comments will
> never be signed in either case. The reasons why are esoteric, but just
> trust me on it.
>
Ok. Of course our xmltooling code doesn't preserve comments anyway, so
I guess the distinction is doubly moot.
- adding custom ContentReference to a signature, Jason Countryman, 04/09/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] adding custom ContentReference to a signature, Brent Putman, 04/09/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] adding custom ContentReference to a signature, Scott Cantor, 04/09/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] adding custom ContentReference to a signature, Brent Putman, 04/09/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] adding custom ContentReference to a signature, Jason Countryman, 04/09/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] adding custom ContentReference to a signature, Brent Putman, 04/09/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] adding custom ContentReference to a signature, Scott Cantor, 04/09/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] adding custom ContentReference to a signature, Brent Putman, 04/09/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.