mace-opensaml-users - RE: [OpenSAML] Use of AssertionIDRequest
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: [OpenSAML] Use of AssertionIDRequest
- Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:56:46 -0500
- Organization: The Ohio State University
rangeli nepal wrote on 2010-02-22:
> "URIs are a protocol-independent means of referring to a resource. This
> binding is not a general SAML request/response binding, but rather
> supports the encapsulation of a <samlp:AssertionIDRequest> message with
> a single <saml:AssertionIDRef> into the resolution of a URI. The result
> of a successful request is a SAML <saml:Assertion> element (but not a
> complete SAML response)."
In other words, it takes what would normally be a request message and turns
it into a URI with no other XML involved.
> I thought this means I need to retrieve Assertion using
AssertionIDRequest.
That's the alternative to this binding. Please take further spec questions
to saml-dev, rather than this list.
-- Scott
- Use of AssertionIDRequest, rangeli nepal, 02/21/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Use of AssertionIDRequest, Chad La Joie, 02/21/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Use of AssertionIDRequest, rangeli nepal, 02/21/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Use of AssertionIDRequest, Chad La Joie, 02/21/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Use of AssertionIDRequest, Scott Cantor, 02/21/2010
- Message not available
- Re: [OpenSAML] Use of AssertionIDRequest, rangeli nepal, 02/22/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Use of AssertionIDRequest, Scott Cantor, 02/22/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Use of AssertionIDRequest, rangeli nepal, 02/22/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Use of AssertionIDRequest, rangeli nepal, 02/21/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Use of AssertionIDRequest, Chad La Joie, 02/21/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.