mace-opensaml-users - RE: [OpenSAML] signed SAMLRequest in SOAPMessage
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: [OpenSAML] signed SAMLRequest in SOAPMessage
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:06:00 -0400
- Organization: The Ohio State University
Xavier Drudis Ferran wrote on 2009-04-24:
> I thought there was some canonicalization method that
> ignored those changes, but I don't remember which
> and maybe it is not usable for this case. But you may want
> to have a look at the definition of canonicalization
> methods in XML-Signature if you can afford to change
> it (I guess you can).
There is no such method. Namespace prefixes are part of the signature. They
have to be because of QNames in content.
-- Scott
- signed SAMLRequest in SOAPMessage, frederik . libert, 04/24/2009
- Re: [OpenSAML] signed SAMLRequest in SOAPMessage, Chad La Joie, 04/24/2009
- Re: [OpenSAML] signed SAMLRequest in SOAPMessage, Xavier Drudis Ferran, 04/24/2009
- RE: [OpenSAML] signed SAMLRequest in SOAPMessage, Scott Cantor, 04/24/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.