mace-opensaml-users - RE: [OpenSAML] [OpenSAML2] Testing SAML relying party browser post profile
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: [OpenSAML] [OpenSAML2] Testing SAML relying party browser post profile
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:46:43 -0500
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> 1. name of the SP machine - for this I provided the external ip address of
> the machine (instead of the machine name) on which my SP server runs. Is
> that okay?
No, it's not.
> 2. the SP's certificate
> - since my SP installtion does not user Shibboleth, it did not
> generate any certificate. So I left this empty. Is this the problem?
Probably.
> - what is this certificate used for?
Authentication of back-channels mostly, and a container for encryption keys
in the metadata.
-- Scott
- RE: [OpenSAML] [OpenSAML2] Testing SAML relying party browser post profile, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit, 12/01/2008
- RE: [OpenSAML] [OpenSAML2] Testing SAML relying party browser post profile, Scott Cantor, 12/02/2008
- RE: [OpenSAML] Testing SAML relying party browser post profile, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit, 12/02/2008
- RE: [OpenSAML] Testing SAML relying party browser post profile, Scott Cantor, 12/02/2008
- RE: [OpenSAML] Testing SAML relying party browser post profile, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit, 12/02/2008
- RE: [OpenSAML] [OpenSAML2] Testing SAML relying party browser post profile, Scott Cantor, 12/02/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.