mace-opensaml-users - RE: [OpenSAML] Testing SAML relying party browser post profile
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Pantvaidya, Vishwajit" <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: RE: [OpenSAML] Testing SAML relying party browser post profile
- Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 18:49:25 -0800
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
For signatures, don't you sign with the private key and then the recipient
validates with the public key? So I thought, the test IdP since it would
generate a signed SAML message would need a private key to test with.
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Cantor
[mailto:]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 4:42 PM
To:
Subject: RE: [OpenSAML] [OpenSAML2] Testing SAML relying party browser post
profile
> The test IdP seems just right. Does it let me provide my own
public-private
> or secret keys that I generated to test my SP?
You have to supply metadata, which includes the public key. Your private key
is your business.
-- Scott
- [OpenSAML2] Testing SAML relying party browser post profile, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit, 11/07/2008
- Re: [OpenSAML] [OpenSAML2] Testing SAML relying party browser post profile, Brent Putman, 11/07/2008
- RE: [OpenSAML] [OpenSAML2] Testing SAML relying party browser post profile, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit, 11/07/2008
- RE: [OpenSAML] [OpenSAML2] Testing SAML relying party browser post profile, Scott Cantor, 11/07/2008
- RE: [OpenSAML] Testing SAML relying party browser post profile, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit, 11/07/2008
- Re: [OpenSAML] Testing SAML relying party browser post profile, Brent Putman, 11/07/2008
- RE: [OpenSAML] Testing SAML relying party browser post profile, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit, 11/07/2008
- RE: [OpenSAML] [OpenSAML2] Testing SAML relying party browser post profile, Scott Cantor, 11/07/2008
- RE: [OpenSAML] [OpenSAML2] Testing SAML relying party browser post profile, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit, 11/07/2008
- Re: [OpenSAML] [OpenSAML2] Testing SAML relying party browser post profile, Brent Putman, 11/07/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.