Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - RE: [OpenSAML] Testing SAML relying party browser post profile

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

RE: [OpenSAML] Testing SAML relying party browser post profile


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Pantvaidya, Vishwajit" <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: RE: [OpenSAML] Testing SAML relying party browser post profile
  • Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 18:49:25 -0800
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US

For signatures, don't you sign with the private key and then the recipient
validates with the public key? So I thought, the test IdP since it would
generate a signed SAML message would need a private key to test with.


-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Cantor
[mailto:]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 4:42 PM
To:

Subject: RE: [OpenSAML] [OpenSAML2] Testing SAML relying party browser post
profile

> The test IdP seems just right. Does it let me provide my own
public-private
> or secret keys that I generated to test my SP?

You have to supply metadata, which includes the public key. Your private key
is your business.

-- Scott





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page