mace-opensaml-users - RE: [OpenSAML] Incorrect X509_Subject constant in NameIdentifier?
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Bob Jacoby" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: [OpenSAML] Incorrect X509_Subject constant in NameIdentifier?
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 07:40:00 -0500
Thanks, Tom. I just entered one
(https://bugs.internet2.edu/jira/browse/JOST-57).
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Scavo
[mailto:]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 5:16 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [OpenSAML] Incorrect X509_Subject constant in
NameIdentifier?
Bob, you are correct. Perhaps you should file a bug?
Tom
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Bob Jacoby
<>
wrote:
> Unless I'm missing something, shouldn't the constant
>
> /** URI for X509 subject name format. */
> public static final String X509_SUBJECT =
> "urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:x509SubjectName";
>
> defined in org.opensaml.saml1.core.NameIdentifier be:
>
> public static final String X509_SUBJECT =
> "urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:X509SubjectName";
>
> Note the capital 'X' in X509SubjectName.
>
> Thanks,
> Bob
>
>
- Incorrect X509_Subject constant in NameIdentifier?, Bob Jacoby, 08/18/2008
- Re: [OpenSAML] Incorrect X509_Subject constant in NameIdentifier?, Tom Scavo, 08/18/2008
- RE: [OpenSAML] Incorrect X509_Subject constant in NameIdentifier?, Bob Jacoby, 08/19/2008
- Re: [OpenSAML] Incorrect X509_Subject constant in NameIdentifier?, Brent Putman, 08/19/2008
- RE: [OpenSAML] Incorrect X509_Subject constant in NameIdentifier?, Bob Jacoby, 08/19/2008
- Re: [OpenSAML] Incorrect X509_Subject constant in NameIdentifier?, Tom Scavo, 08/18/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.