mace-opensaml-users - Re: [OpenSAML] Incorrect X509_Subject constant in NameIdentifier?
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Tom Scavo" <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [OpenSAML] Incorrect X509_Subject constant in NameIdentifier?
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:16:07 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=tMS08N/WRuUhyPz3WoSnTY1me/zZneHQOc27GyUvRv5MPV9vW8z/gNqzj0gwFmmDIo ZLcdcIf+WJuVcklLXmjGBmoF7rZo6sR8qob46ugpF3X+8OKlpIRdnynCiq6MK0e+BAgg ohyoE2ZVP7uyMHSTetGixBYGYoOMxZZYU2SPs=
Bob, you are correct. Perhaps you should file a bug?
Tom
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Bob Jacoby
<>
wrote:
> Unless I'm missing something, shouldn't the constant
>
> /** URI for X509 subject name format. */
> public static final String X509_SUBJECT =
> "urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:x509SubjectName";
>
> defined in org.opensaml.saml1.core.NameIdentifier be:
>
> public static final String X509_SUBJECT =
> "urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:X509SubjectName";
>
> Note the capital 'X' in X509SubjectName.
>
> Thanks,
> Bob
>
>
- Incorrect X509_Subject constant in NameIdentifier?, Bob Jacoby, 08/18/2008
- Re: [OpenSAML] Incorrect X509_Subject constant in NameIdentifier?, Tom Scavo, 08/18/2008
- RE: [OpenSAML] Incorrect X509_Subject constant in NameIdentifier?, Bob Jacoby, 08/19/2008
- Re: [OpenSAML] Incorrect X509_Subject constant in NameIdentifier?, Brent Putman, 08/19/2008
- RE: [OpenSAML] Incorrect X509_Subject constant in NameIdentifier?, Bob Jacoby, 08/19/2008
- Re: [OpenSAML] Incorrect X509_Subject constant in NameIdentifier?, Tom Scavo, 08/18/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.