Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - Re: [OpenSAML]

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Re: [OpenSAML]


Chronological Thread 
  • From:
  • To:
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: [OpenSAML]
  • Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:24:10 -0400


Sorry, should have provided more detail:

WebSphere Platform 6.1 [BASE 6.1.0.2 cf20633.22]  running with process name DWS3WACH37czwc1Node01Cell\DWS3WACH37czwc1Node01\server1 and process id 4332
Host Operating System is Windows XP, version 5.1 build 2600 Service Pack 2
Java version = J2RE 1.5.0 IBM J9 2.3 Windows XP x86-32 j9vmwi3223-20060504 (JIT enabled)
J9VM - 20060501_06428_lHdSMR
JIT  - 20060428_1800_r8
GC   - 20060501_AA, Java Compiler = j9jit23, Java VM name = IBM J9 VM

Here are the security providers for this JVM:
security.provider.1=com.ibm.crypto.provider.IBMJCE
security.provider.2=com.ibm.jsse.IBMJSSEProvider
security.provider.3=com.ibm.jsse2.IBMJSSEProvider2
security.provider.4=com.ibm.security.jgss.IBMJGSSProvider
security.provider.5=com.ibm.security.cert.IBMCertPath
security.provider.6=com.ibm.crypto.pkcs11.provider.IBMPKCS11
security.provider.7=com.ibm.security.cmskeystore.CMSProvider
security.provider.8=com.ibm.security.jgss.mech.spnego.IBMSPNEGO

And I add bouncycastle in the code.  This is just my sandbox.

Edward Thompson




Chad La Joie <>

07/17/2008 08:13 AM

Please respond to

To
cc
Subject
Re: [OpenSAML]





Sun or IBM?

wrote:
> 1.5_15 running under websphere 6.1
>
> Edward Thompson
>
>
>
>
>
> Chad La Joie <>
> 07/17/2008 08:03 AM
> Please respond to
>
>
>
> To
>
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: [OpenSAML]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I know some other people are using this on Windows and I haven't heard
> anything like this from them.  What JVM are you using?
>
> wrote:
>> I am using the latest SAML2 library for Java.
>> When I call the encrypt() method of an Encryter for an Attribute, it
> looks
>> like the downline code is using
>> SecureRandom to generate an unique id for the Node.  On my XP machine at
>
>> least, this is a VERY expensive operation, and I find it spending
> 2.2-2.5
>> seconds
>> in the nextByte() .
>>
>> Do others find this to be true?  Is there a way I can generate my own id
>
>> for the Node?
>>
>> SecureRandom is critical for key generation et al. but isn't it overkill
>
>> for generating a simple id?
>> What am I missing?
>>
>> Edward Thompson
>> Charlotte, NC 28202
>>
>

--
SWITCH
Serving Swiss Universities
--------------------------
Chad La Joie, Software Engineer, Net Services
Werdstrasse 2, P.O. Box, 8021 Zürich, Switzerland
phone +41 44 268 15 75, fax +41 44 268 15 68
, http://www.switch.ch





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page