mace-opensaml-users - RE: Re: Re: [OpenSAML] AddRespondWith method
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: Re: Re: [OpenSAML] AddRespondWith method
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:05:28 -0400
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> Well, the IdP generated the artifact to begin with, so the IdP knows
> what SAMLResponse to return (i.e., the same SAMLResponse it would have
> returned via Browser/POST). I presume that's why the <RespondWith>
> element was deprecated early on, because it adds nothing significant
> to the message exchange.
Yes, it has a long and tortured past, which is all documented in the SSTC
archives. Search there if you care, but don't use it. Whatever you think it
will buy you, you're off base.
-- Scott
- Re: Re: [OpenSAML] AddRespondWith method, lavanya505, 06/26/2008
- Re: Re: [OpenSAML] AddRespondWith method, Tom Scavo, 06/26/2008
- Re: [OpenSAML] AddRespondWith method, Chad La Joie, 06/26/2008
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Re: Re: [OpenSAML] AddRespondWith method, lavanya505, 06/26/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [OpenSAML] AddRespondWith method, Tom Scavo, 06/26/2008
- RE: Re: Re: [OpenSAML] AddRespondWith method, Scott Cantor, 06/26/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [OpenSAML] AddRespondWith method, Tom Scavo, 06/26/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.