Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - Re: Re: [OpenSAML] AddRespondWith method

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Re: Re: [OpenSAML] AddRespondWith method


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Tom Scavo" <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: Re: [OpenSAML] AddRespondWith method
  • Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:26:31 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=rX0fbWN0rVoXVcLm7qXpq25gsSOTlmt0MxJ77biqzsdnUNRlnmrI1xKv2dvpmAPcnn XYU5lUXxXI3HQfnTisQ4p0ooy/Ys5O3Y8eKZxK/11ygH8LlZXFKy2tMPJShevN2gk+E5 lxz0HkSrTAjcNBdjHyWcG7uBjzX4TF+yoUobM=
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:14 AM,
<>
wrote:
> Do i need to specify namespaceURI in the constructor if i want
> saml:AuthenticationStatement in the respondWith element?

No, because the "saml" prefix is presumably already defined within the
scope of the <RespondWith> element.

> java.xml.namespace.QName respondWith=new
> java.xml.namespace.QName("","AuthenticationStatement","saml");

That's javax.xml.namespace.QName (not java.xml.namespace.QName).

> r.addRespondWith("");

r.addRespondWith(respondWith);

I've never actually done any of the above so YMMV. Note that the
<RespondWith> element is deprecated in SAML V1.1 and gone in SAML
V2.0, so avoid it now if you can.

Tom

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page