Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - Re: Multiple subjects in SAML 1.x statement?

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Re: Multiple subjects in SAML 1.x statement?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Tom Scavo" <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: Multiple subjects in SAML 1.x statement?
  • Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:41:54 -0500
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=xLhjpxfd/riHmRPAMWTgg2sf7k0IrnAYUGacFK2NFWmcgcaAxNoUCFjQI9du8cWbnRk0AjVuNN3syfkc9mlOGZe0sZFFg49ysgEiL9eRHpDegpvM0XGl4/TVjgoRgM3A4CbKEQ+3I2IOpdTInQ3b+/8hY+nX6p0d+nWpy1SiJpw=
Here's a pointer to the "Subject-based Profiles for SAML V1.1
Assertions" I mentioned earlier:

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/26572/sstc-saml1-profiles-assertion-subject-draft-01.pdf

A version of this has been implemented using OpenSAML 1.1.

Tom

On Dec 13, 2007 2:35 PM, Scott Cantor
<>
wrote:
> > Yes, but the SSTC doesn't appear to have much interest in SAML V1.1
> > (understandably) so I've refrained. If you'd like to co-edit this
> > with me, let me know and I'll send it along for your review. Or I
> > could post it here for all to see if you think that's best.
>
> I'd probably beg off any extra work right at the moment, but posting it here
> is fine, or just to security-services, which is public so anybody could see
> it, but the TC could decide if they think it's of interest.
>
> -- Scott
>
>
>

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page