OpenSAML user discussion

[Brent Putman <>]

Darn, very sorry about that.  I have fixed (again), hopefully for real this time.

--Brent


Denis Koelewijn wrote:

Hi,

This bugfix in r1095 is not entirely correct. I have made an Jira issue:
https://bugs.internet2.edu/jira/browse/JOST-18

Regards, Denis

On 18/09/2007, Brent Putman <> wrote:

Yes, correct, thanks.  Fixed in SVN in  r1095.


wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I found a bug in class RequestedAuthnContextBuilder.
>
> The QName must be :
> {urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:protocol}RequestedAuthnContext
>
> but is actualy :
> {urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion}RequestedAuthnContext
>
> I think the adjustment must be:
>
>     /** {@inheritDoc} */
>     public RequestedAuthnContext buildObject() {
>         /* OLD
>         return buildObject(SAMLConstants.SAML20_NS, RequestedAuthnContext.DEFAULT_ELEMENT_LOCAL_NAME , SAMLConstants.SAML20_PREFIX);
>         OLD */
>         return buildObject(SAMLConstants.SAML20P_NS, RequestedAuthnContext.DEFAULT_ELEMENT_LOCAL_NAME, SAMLConstants.SAML20P_PREFIX);
> }
>
> Regards,
> Hans Wijnsouw
>