mace-opensaml-users - RE: A suggestion about digital signatures
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Massimiliano Masi <>
- To:
- Subject: RE: A suggestion about digital signatures
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 10:10:14 +0200
Hi,
Quoting George Stanchev
<>:
I don't think it's generally acceptable to send two assertions in one
token element, no.
The problem is still the same: if we don't accept two assertion in one
<RequestedSecurityToken /> element, how can I add two assertions
in <wsse:Security /> element?
I can put two Security headers and reference them as tokens, but ?
I know, since there are no profiles, I can do what I want in principle,
but I would like to know also your opinion.
Thanks,
Massimiliano
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
- A suggestion about digital signatures, Massimiliano Masi, 09/19/2007
- RE: A suggestion about digital signatures, Scott Cantor, 09/19/2007
- RE: A suggestion about digital signatures, George Stanchev, 09/19/2007
- RE: A suggestion about digital signatures, Massimiliano Masi, 09/20/2007
- RE: A suggestion about digital signatures, Massimiliano Masi, 09/21/2007
- RE: A suggestion about digital signatures, Scott Cantor, 09/21/2007
- RE: A suggestion about digital signatures, Massimiliano Masi, 09/22/2007
- RE: A suggestion about digital signatures, Scott Cantor, 09/23/2007
- RE: A suggestion about digital signatures, Massimiliano Masi, 09/22/2007
- RE: A suggestion about digital signatures, Scott Cantor, 09/21/2007
- RE: A suggestion about digital signatures, George Stanchev, 09/19/2007
- Re: A suggestion about digital signatures, Brent Putman, 09/19/2007
- RE: A suggestion about digital signatures, Scott Cantor, 09/19/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.