OpenSAML user discussion

[Chad La Joie <>]

Yeah, I didn't think about the built in test file; should have.  That
should be easy enough to do.

Scott Cantor wrote:
>> Ah, right.  I'm honestly not sure how to trap that one because it
>> doesn't through a unique error.  That particular error gets through
>> basically for any validation or namespace problem.
> 
> Yeah, I wondered whether we had a way to just hack in a check for it during
> the configuration parse operation since that's in one spot. Just a thought.
> 
> Or even just create a self-contained test of a parse of a file that's
> built-in and if it fails, you know Xalan is horked. I know from experience
> that our time is saved doing the test than answering the question every
> time. Even if people don't read the message and ask, they look dumb asking,
> so there's still a payoff. ;-) sort of
>  
> -- Scott
> 

-- 
Chad La Joie             2052-C Harris Bldg
OIS-Middleware           202.687.0124