mace-opensaml-users - RE: Sigining of Assertion instead of Response

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

RE: Sigining of Assertion instead of Response

From: "Scott Cantor" <>
To: <>
Subject: RE: Sigining of Assertion instead of Response
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:14:55 -0500
Organization: The Ohio State University

> I was just pointed by our partner to the errata document, where it seems
> that you already cleaned it up. E26 describes a change, so that the
response may
> be signed instead of the assertion:

Ugh. I really need to start reading from the errata drafts now that Eve has
them done. Sorry for the confusion.

The good news is there's actually a way for the errata to become "official"
now, instead of just informal. Should happen soon.

-- Scott

Sigining of Assertion instead of Response, Andreas Vallen, 01/15/2007
- Re: Sigining of Assertion instead of Response, Tom Scavo, 01/15/2007
  - Re: Sigining of Assertion instead of Response, Andreas Vallen, 01/15/2007
    - Re: Sigining of Assertion instead of Response, Tom Scavo, 01/15/2007
      - Re: Sigining of Assertion instead of Response, Andreas Vallen, 01/16/2007
- RE: Sigining of Assertion instead of Response, Scott Cantor, 01/15/2007
  - Re: Sigining of Assertion instead of Response, Andreas Vallen, 01/16/2007
    - Re: Sigining of Assertion instead of Response, Tom Scavo, 01/16/2007
    - RE: Sigining of Assertion instead of Response, Scott Cantor, 01/16/2007
      - Re: Sigining of Assertion instead of Response, Andreas Vallen, 01/16/2007
        
        RE: Sigining of Assertion instead of Response, Scott Cantor, 01/16/2007

List archive

RE: Sigining of Assertion instead of Response